Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 15.160
Filtrar
Mais filtros








Intervalo de ano de publicação
2.
Rehabil Nurs ; 49(3): 75-79, 2024.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38696433

RESUMO

ABSTRACT: Rehabilitation nurses possess knowledge and skills that are ideally suited to a variety of roles. This article informs rehabilitation nurses about opportunities to work in private case management for medical-legal cases. A brief overview of the process of litigation gives nurses the context in which case management interventions are needed. Case examples illustrate the services that nurses provide to attorneys and their clients that help obtain needed care and aid in progressing litigation to resolution.


Assuntos
Administração de Caso , Advogados , Enfermagem em Reabilitação , Humanos , Administração de Caso/legislação & jurisprudência , Administração de Caso/normas , Enfermagem em Reabilitação/métodos , Consultores/legislação & jurisprudência , Imperícia/legislação & jurisprudência
7.
Health Phys ; 126(6): 426-433, 2024 Jun 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38568160

RESUMO

ABSTRACT: As the basis of radiation safety practice and regulations worldwide, the linear no-threshold (LNT) hypothesis exerts enormous influence throughout society. This includes our judicial system, where frivolous lawsuits are filed alleging radiation-induced health effects caused by negligent companies who subject unwitting victims to enormous financial and physical harm. Typically, despite the lack of any supporting scientific basis, these cases result in enormous costs to organizations, insurance companies, and consumers.


Assuntos
Proteção Radiológica , Humanos , Proteção Radiológica/legislação & jurisprudência , Proteção Radiológica/normas , Lesões por Radiação/prevenção & controle , Imperícia/legislação & jurisprudência , Relação Dose-Resposta à Radiação
8.
BMC Health Serv Res ; 24(1): 521, 2024 Apr 25.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38664671

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Compensation for medical damage liability disputes (CMDLD) seriously hinders the healthy development of hospitals and undermines the harmony of the doctor-patient relationships (DPR). Risk management in the DPR has become an urgent issue of the day. The study aims to provide a comprehensive description of CMDLD in China and explore its influencing factors, and make corresponding recommendations for the management of risks in the DPR. METHODS: This study extracted data from the China Judgment Online - the official judicial search website with the most comprehensive coverage. Statistical analysis of 1,790 litigation cases of medical damage liability disputes (COMDLD) available from 2015 to 2021. RESULTS: COMDLD generally tended to increase with the year and was unevenly distributed by regions; the compensation rate was 52.46%, the median compensation was 134,900 yuan and the maximum was 2,234,666 yuan; the results of the single factor analysis showed that there were statistically significant differences between the compensation for different years, regions, treatment attributes, and trial procedures (P < 0.05); the correlation analysis showed that types of hospitals were significantly negatively associated with regions (R=-0.082, P < 0.05); trial procedures were significantly negatively correlated with years (R=-0.484, P < 0.001); compensat- ion was significantly positively correlated with years, regions, and treatment attributes (R = 0.098-0.294, P < 0.001) and negatively correlated with trial procedures (R=-0.090, P < 0.01); regression analysis showed that years, treatment attributes, and regions were the main factors affecting the CMDLD (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Years, regions, treatment attributes, and trial procedures affect the outcome of CMDLD. This paper further puts forward relevant suggestions and countermeasures for the governance of doctor-patient risks based on the empirical results. Including rational allocation of medical resources to narrow the differences between regions; promoting the expansion and sinking of high-quality resources to improve the level of medical services in hospitals at all levels; and developing a third-party negotiation mechanism for medical disputes to reduce the cost of medical litigation.


Assuntos
Responsabilidade Legal , Imperícia , Relações Médico-Paciente , Gestão de Riscos , Humanos , China , Imperícia/legislação & jurisprudência , Imperícia/estatística & dados numéricos , Imperícia/economia , Compensação e Reparação/legislação & jurisprudência , Dissidências e Disputas/legislação & jurisprudência , Pesquisa Empírica
11.
Prog Transplant ; 34(1-2): 11-19, 2024 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38454748

RESUMO

Introduction: Transplantation is a field with unique medical and administrative challenges that involve an equally diverse array of stakeholders. Expectantly, the litigation stemming from this field should be similarly nuanced. There is a paucity of comprehensive reviews characterizing this medicolegal landscape. Design: The Caselaw Access Project Database was used to collect official court briefs of 2053 lawsuits related to kidney, liver, heart, lung, and pancreas transplantation. A thematic analysis was undertaken to characterize grounds for litigation, defendant type, and outcomes. Cases were grouped into policy, discrimination, poor or unsuccessful outcome, or other categories. Results: One hundred sixty-four court cases were included for analysis. Cases involving disputes over policy coverage were the most common across all organ types (N = 55, 33.5%). This was followed by poor outcomes (N = 51, 31.1%), allegations of discrimination against prison systems and employers (N = 37, 22.6%) and other (N = 21, 12.8%). Defendants involved in discrimination trials won with the greatest frequency (N = 29, 90.62%). Defendants implicated in policy suits won 65.3% (N = 32), poor outcomes 62.2% (N = 28), and other 70% (N = 14). Of the 51 cases involving poor outcomes, plaintiffs indicated lack of informed consent in 23 (45.1%). Conclusion: Reconsidering the informed consent process may be a viable means of mitigating future legal action. Most discrimination suits favoring defendants suggested previous concerns of structural injustices in transplantation may not be founded. The prevalence of policy-related cases could be an indication of financial burden on patients. Future work and advocacy will need to substantiate these concerns and address change where legal recourse falls short.


Assuntos
Imperícia , Transplante de Órgãos , Humanos , Transplante de Órgãos/legislação & jurisprudência , Imperícia/legislação & jurisprudência , Imperícia/estatística & dados numéricos , Estados Unidos , Preconceito , Política de Saúde/legislação & jurisprudência
12.
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg ; 62(3): 229-232, 2024 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38402069

RESUMO

The chance of death from medical error within the hospital setting is 33,000 times greater than dying in an aircraft crash. Despite patient safety being central to healthcare delivery across the world, medical errors and patient harm remain prevalent. This review evaluates the role of the criminal law in regulating healthcare across England and Wales, using prior legal case studies, and focussing on the offence of gross negligence manslaughter (GNM). It further examines the extent to which the law promotes patient safety and minimises fatal errors in healthcare. Medical negligence resulting in a patient's death invokes the more punitive criminal law. In the context of the legal framework in England and Wales, individuals, including medical professionals, who are found to have caused a fatality due to 'gross negligence' may potentially be subject to manslaughter charges. Healthcare delivery is complex as it involves working in high-risk environments, invariably as part of a team. When things go wrong, it is rarely the result of an individual's error but rather a systemic failure. Human factors that may contribute to GNM include organisational influences such as trust targets and pressures to deliver results, unsafe supervision, or inadequate staffing, and preconditions for unsafe acts whereby clinicians are fatigued whilst performing multiple roles simultaneously. A more just culture is warranted in response to the criminalisation of cases of healthcare malpractice, in particular those involving GNM, in which healthcare professionals would be able to learn without fear of retribution.


Assuntos
Imperícia , Erros Médicos , Segurança do Paciente , Humanos , Segurança do Paciente/legislação & jurisprudência , Erros Médicos/legislação & jurisprudência , Imperícia/legislação & jurisprudência , Inglaterra , País de Gales , Direito Penal
18.
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol ; 61(1): 102-109, 2022 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35181016

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Increasing obstetric medical litigations had great impacts in health care system resulted in lower recruitment of residents and higher medical cost of defensive medicine in Taiwan. In order to reduce medical litigation, the "Childbirth Accident Emergency Relief Act" was implemented in June 2016. This study presented five-year results of a novel childbirth accident compensation system. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The purpose of the Relief Act was to establish a national relief system to ensure timely relief, reduce medical disputes, promote the partnership between patient and medical personnel. The compensations included maximal 2 million NTD for maternal death, maximal 0.3 million NTD for neonatal and fetal deaths, and 3, 2, and 1.5 million NTD for maternal or neonatal profound, severe, and moderate disabilities, respectively. Puerperal hysterectomy was included with maximal 0.8 million NTD compensation. RESULTS: Since June 30, 2016 to June 30, 2021, there were 1340 applications reviewed by Committee and 1258 were approved with total relief of 744.7 million NTD (26.6 million USD) with approve rate of 93.9%. It took an average of 109.8 days to start application from childbirth and 102.4 days to get compensation from application. 66.1% of accident victims agreed this system can restore doctor-patient relationship by immediate care and assistance from medical institutions. CONCLUSION: The Relief Act is the first government leading compensation system to establish a national relief system. It was enacted to reduce medical disputes, promote the partnership between patient and medical personnel, and enhance health and safety of women during childbirth. A no-fault compensation would be an efficient alternative disputes resolution to childbirth accidents.


Assuntos
Traumatismos do Nascimento , Compensação e Reparação/legislação & jurisprudência , Dissidências e Disputas , Imperícia/legislação & jurisprudência , Erros Médicos/legislação & jurisprudência , Relações Médico-Paciente , Traumatismos do Nascimento/epidemiologia , Traumatismos do Nascimento/etiologia , Parto Obstétrico , Feminino , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Seguro de Responsabilidade Civil , Responsabilidade Legal , Gravidez , Taiwan/epidemiologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA